Sunday, January 12, 2020

Anticipating 2020

Financial and market forecasts from year to year are often way off base, but investors demand guidance at the beginning of each new year.

In any given year, it is a difficult and sometimes meaningless exercise to present New Year's forecasts of financial markets and activity.  Pundits, analysts and the media attempt to do so anyway and then realize 12 months later how far off they are from their projections.

They try to predict market behavior and market volatility.  They try to predict new products and trends in the marketplace. Some try to predict which firms, financial institutions or companies will rise above all others in performance or stature.

In fact, just weeks ago, who could have projected the focus of global attention would have transitioned from trade tensions in China and protests on the streets in Hong Kong to a renewed U.S.-Iran standoff?

Yet investors and other financial stakeholders push for forecasts. They seek guidance on how to manage risks, portfolios or trading positions.  They seek reinforcement of their own views of where they think the market is headed or what activities we expect to see in capital markets.

The year unfolds, and then we observe markets going in unexpected directions. Or we observe events or trends no one had any idea was forthcoming.  Over a year ago, market analysts predicted increases in interest rates, and investment managers braced for the subsequent impact on fixed-income portfolios.  A year later, market analysts and policy makers turned course and projected interest rates would decline.  After a tumultuous stock-market year in 2018, which led to losses in most indices around the world, investors prepared for an unimpressive 2019. And then equity markets soared (although there were the usual periods of intolerable volatility).

A year ago investors and bankers salivated with glee anticipating the IPO of WeWork.  A year later, sentiments about the company have soured, while an IPO has been postponed indefinitely.  The fervor about a WeWork public offering has turned into concern about how the IPO market should work going forward (and about the specific roles of the banks that bring new companies to the public markets).

Initial Public Offerings

Will the WeWork debacle slow down the new-issues market and spur banks to overhaul the process of taking a company public? Will the debacle alter the traditional timetables of taking a new venture public? Will companies be forced to prove more definitively the plan to achieve sustainable profitability?

Because investors want more certainty about when a new company will generate positive operating cash flows, will companies postpone for longer periods the calendar to go public? What should or what will the role of investment banks be?

Saudi Arabia's planned IPO for its state-owned oil company Aramco endured starts and stops for its late fall offering, especially after it sought a $2 trillion market value and couldn't be assured the market would assess the same at the desired level. 

A few years ago, financial markets were struggling and fumbling to understand the popularity of cryptocurrencies. Many announced they would have nothing to do with them. A few decided to exploit such popularity and determine a role where they can make money.  After digesting what they were or supposed to be, financial institutions were poised to define their roles (advisers, facilitators, brokers, etc.) and then hop onto the bandwagon in some way.  

Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains

By late 2019, cryptocurrencies had not disappeared, but the fad had receded or at least capital markets and investors got comfortable that they wouldn't major currencies or traditional payments systems anytime soon. They weren't alarmed the Bitcoin would replace the precious government-sanctioned currencies (U.S. dollar, Euros, e.g.) (as some projected a few years ago).  In 2019, Facebook jumped in, announcing a planned creation of a new currency Libra (along with partners and offering comfort by backing its value with real assets).  By late 2019, Facebook's enthusiasm for the same had waned, and the company had even suggested it could withdraw from the project. 

Distributed ledger technology (or what is better known as "Blockchain" technology), the type of system that runs cryptocurrency activity, hasn't disappeared. A year or so ago, companies around the world began to figure out how to exploit it to gain advantages in trading, trade processing, trade finance, and supply-chain management.  Industries and companies have begun to experiment and roll out Blockchain systems for non-cryptocurrency purposes, although progress on all fronts (in, say, trade finance and trade processing) has been measured. 

Companies in Favor and Not

Among big corporate names, companies (like WeWork) that were favored darlings in decades past or in recent years, all of a sudden, seemed doomed by 2019. Some companies (perhaps like a GE or a Tesla) that were rocked, criticized and vulnerable continue to plod along, tweaking and adjusting to figure out a niche and regain market favorability.

GE has seemingly gone through countless reorganizations (and senior management changes), yet it may finally get things right in its latest transformation. Tesla, notwithstanding moments of anxiety surrounding its head Elon Musk, had struggled with surging operating costs, uncertain markets, stiff competition everywhere, and burdensome debt. By late 2019, it had begun to flirt with reporting profits. 

Some companies, like HP (the split-off and incarnation from the old Hewlitt Packard company), thought they had devised the right long-term strategy, but all of a sudden must regroup and figure out next steps.  HP, in early 2020, is now a takeover target for Xerox. 

All over, markets and investors are watching the entertainment-streaming industry closely.  Before it faced the fierce competition it encounters today, Netflix stepped out in front and helped change behavior of consumers (or the millions of subscribers willing to pay monthly fees for content). 

The company is now obsessed with and committed to developing its own content (because it figures it alone can assure the customer base of quality programming), but Netflix is similarly stubborn it can develop new content by funding it with more and more debt.  It knows it has competition (from Disney, HBO, Hulu, and just about any large company with financial resources and access to content); it may not understand it may not be able to refinance and roll over its debt forever. 

Amazon:  Mightier and Mightier

No analysis or discussion of global companies these days omit an assessment of Amazon, which may have--at least for the time being--supplanted big names like Apple and Alphabet-Google as the mighty titans in corporate market values. The company has always been propelled by a growth strategy on steroids. Unlike in years past, the company is now consistently profitable and generating accounting profits (about $11 billion for 2019) and gushing operating cash flows (about $8 billion a quarter).  

Because Amazon doesn't pay a dividend (and doesn't appear to be distracted by shareholder activities who demand dividends and buy-backs), it can reinvest the cash and continue to get bigger and bigger. It can, too, afford to experiment, innovate and make investing mistakes. In just three years, the company has tripled its revenues (now above $235 billion annually).  Continued growth and innovation at Amazon are likely the few sure bets for 2020. 

Markets like to contemplate, predict and reflect the political outcomes.  Markets in early 2020 don't appear to have any intuition about the results of U.S. presidential election or the impact of elections on U.S. financial institutions (to regulate more or to regulate even less?). 

About the only thing that's certain in 2020 is that (a) investors demand forecasts, (b) analysts and media observers will provide them, (c) most forecasts will be off base before 2021 arrives, and (d) as soon as there is some informed premonition about what can and will happen, markets will reflect it efficiently and quickly.

Tracy E. Williams

See also:

CFN:  And Now Comes Libra, 2019
CFN:  What Will Be the Trigger? 2018
CFN:  How Will Netflix Manage Its Debt Burden? 2018
CFN:  What Does the Market See in Amazon? 2014

No comments:

Post a Comment